Are there potential problems here? Certainly. Is this being blown way out of proportion to the scope of the issue? Certainly.
— Brian Sweeney (@briswe) July 9, 2015
If one of your evidence sources is internet addiction centers in China then your article's premise is already failing.
— Brian Sweeney (@briswe) July 9, 2015
Back in my day we didn't *read*, we worked in the factory and we loved it.
— Brian Sweeney (@briswe) July 9, 2015
Back in my day we used to play games like "chew the bark off the tree."
— Brian Sweeney (@briswe) July 9, 2015
This article reads like a "back in my day" screed against technological advance. http://t.co/SHVr9VZJRu
— Brian Sweeney (@briswe) July 9, 2015
No: "yes, of course, as it's written in the doctrine, there may be limited use of nonstrategic nuclear weapons"
— Brian Sweeney (@briswe) July 9, 2015
Two young ladies, in a jeep, smoking pipes. 😮
— Brian Sweeney (@briswe) July 9, 2015
"We'll be here for Estonia" President Obama pledged. Less than 48 hours later Russian agents kidnapped an Estonian official.
— Brian Sweeney (@briswe) July 8, 2015
"Russia seems doomed to continue its decline… States in decline…tend to become less risk-averse and thus much more dangerous."
— Brian Sweeney (@briswe) July 8, 2015
This is scary stuff: "War is not something that's impossible anymore."
— Brian Sweeney (@briswe) July 8, 2015